Liob, 2026
tags: concentric, solar writing systems, counting, informational storage, solarization
Modern grammatology has universally been appropriated towards the maintenance of standardized linguistics. An architecture founded upon the assertion of systemic stability has to trap the informatics of experience into a “web of nouns”. For instance, expressing mere thought becomes functionally impossible in stable language. To express ideas requires the conformity of verb-subject-object, leaving ambiguity to be lost in the post-poetic world. The utility of such linguistic compression is self evident; from the economics of the decimal system to the universalization of spelling and diction. Systems innately gravitate towards standardization, optimization and homeostasis. In doing so however, the process becomes something like this: a pre-conceptual void is captured in a gestalt of itself, becoming an immanence of familiarity similar to the primitive cave paintings of the neolithic, ultimately causing a runaway over-determination of the counting system as levels of agricultural accounting burden themselves on the agricultural cycles of cybernetic control. Time becomes secondary to space, internalized on the level of the subject, leaving the pre-original a mere in-itself inaccessible epistemically. What follows is the capture of various contractions. As civilizational progress takes hold, language follows along carefully, mapping the exact moments by which temporal events occur in an effort to stave off indeterminacy. When for instance, the act of work becomes tracked according to a here and now, and consequently, a there and then, it becomes an eternal regress of the accounting system. In ancient societies in the fertile crescent, centralization becomes a nightmare of calculation, bridging gestalts together. Gestaltation becomes an operation of capture, rather than individuation. At this point, politics become the stages of an increasingly managed clash of exotic times and spaces. From the Roman Republic to the City States of the Holy Roman Empire and finally to the modern liberal democratic nation states, what defines the linguistic individual is the fusion of timelines into a psychic and externalized web of relations, synchronized to the level of verbs and nouns. This process arguably forms the plight of the primitivists and palingeneticists, who long for the unity of representations and of whole immediacy at the human level. For them, authenticity is impossible under such developing grammatological conditions. Naturally, the question lies open if they are indeed correct and we need to collectively come to the senses of the ancient pagans or if the process of grammatology is only plagued by apprehension if it is something to captured, furthermore represented on yet another sheet of paper or the digital screen.
But what is actually grammatology, and by what exact process does linguistics relates to the timeless void of pre-origin? We can describe here the exact process, as a story if it were. If we were to really look inside what a person or an object really is, we would found the reduction of various levels onto a first cause of causation. Nothing out of the ordinary; the body is made of flesh, flesh is made of cells, cells have a phospholipid membrane, molecules are made from atoms, atoms are made from subatomic particles, and so on. The important part here is of course the “and so on”. We can reduce only to the level to which it makes causal sense, and to the level at which we may describe correlates; after the flesh series comes the cell series, not the particle series. This means that in a sense grammatology is the accounting of Gestalts. The simplest example of a Gestalt is that 2 is indeed the gestalt of 1 and 1, essentially the practice of summation. On a more physical level, time is the simple flow between the various series. Of course, taking into account the problematic of first cause, we need to consider that time is not simply what determines, but rather the relation of itself according to a self-meeting point. Practically, we see an Ouroboros already being formed, for the image of the self-consuming snake signals eternal return, and the repetition of the series over and over again. If we thus take time to be what it actually is, in-itself and as a Gestalt of itself, then it appears that this in-itself of time is actually timelessness and the eternal. The circularity of time that appears once we take it as the contraction of itself with itself encloses a space in between the snake. We find once more that the internal of the Gestalt, in our case the Ouroboros of Time, there is again a void. This void always paradoxically appears as a result of any contraction. This means that if it were, that we develop a primitive grammatology of a series of amplifications, it appears that the external intensification merely holds a genetic void of itself at a timeless point. This void would not be the negative of the thing, for the void is simultaneously the possibility of every possibility and the possibility of every impossibility. Our void here is both figurative and literal. Figurative in the sense that once we determine and take account of Gestalts, the first cause always appears dark and unclear. Literal means here that beyond external accounting mechanisms, there is no internal true essence of a thing-the Ouroboros is nothing in the center, only the snake is the thing observed and the carrier of its own external relations. If we thus take this assertion to grammatology, we can say that the orderings within language reflect the arrangement that language is external to itself, and carries its own rules for itself and does not merely call out or point to other objects. Such calling out is an influence on the grammatical system, not the product of the system. Yet, the paradox of the void comes to fruition here as well. What grammatology meets as things coming to influence it, are in actuality grammatology doing the same operation of eternal return; it is language catching itself in its own systematic gravitational field. This ultimately suggests that there is no “neutral” expressions isolated from a system. Grammatology always carries its own duration of time. If we take the Ouroboros, the snakes own duration is recorded on its surface, skin and scales record every moment that the snake has slithered and every moment of encountering textures of another surface. On the Moon for instance, it was long a problem of time keeping that the astronauts aboard Apollo encountered. Beyond the mere day and night cycle being different to that of Earth, the Moon is an example of a particularly rich duration of time. Craters show impacts from billions of years ago, and in particular polar craters, the sun never shines or sets. Any astronaut wishing to keep track of time according to Earth time on the Moon is bound to encounter inconsistencies, and it only becomes logical to create a literal lunar calendar. But should these changes and calendric reforms happen on the basis of optimization and homeostasis, then perhaps it is blurred what is actually happening to the calendar as it changes. Interactions between Earth time and Lunar time would occur within the domain of the Lunar system, not in the domain of Earthly beings optimizing the Moon; it would be within the Lunar gravitational field, literally.
Planets and bodies are therefore linguistically and grammatologically relevant as Gestalt-systems of accounting, interacting on a cosmological basis of reality. Different locations in space operate on principles of orderings, be it as surfaces of temporal craters detailing historicity and duration, or as in the case of gas Giants such as Jupiter and Saturn, the destruction of any such accounting. Gaseous masses are the grammatology of a non-linear surface, in which informational homeostasis is made to arise from the dynamism of storms and planetary-wide bands and streaks. Such a non-terrestrial system can be considered one of many among the universe, among many grammatologies. However, one such exception to all other systems would be that of the star. The Sun is unique by the fact it is indeed circular, possessing a surface, and in our case a ground (Grund), and yet, no recording of Gestalts is to be found within the solar grammatological system. The Sun only expels, and does not receive information from the external. We are left to wonder what solar grammatology could possible be, since the Sun with its explosivity takes the role of the temporal and timeless past unbounded by recursion. How could the Sun meet itself if it is constantly expelling itself to the void of Space? Yet again, if we consider the internal Sun, it is no different than a void existing. The solar void would be the truest character of the Sun; the meeting void and void, potentials and potentials. The Sun renews itself, leaving a permanent source of origin for the other planets and life on Earth. The solar grammatology is therefore a grammatology of interactions of making-Ouroboros, all other cosmological grammtologies with the Solar System are made to be themselves via the formation of a surface, and the enclosure of the void of origin, belonging to the Sun. When the first cells emerged, it was a mere dramatic retelling of all of genesis. The micelle was submerged in an ocean that could be considered a void of Otherness, and once the enclosure of such an oceanic environment by phospholipid membrane had occurred with all the necessary components of a cell, it was the repetition of the Solar form with the addition of an individuation engine of Yes-No logics. The circularity of the cells was that which was inherited form the timeless past and the Sun, repetitively informing the duration of one form into a new one. The cellular membrane acted as the primary grammatic of cellular language; allow beneficial molecules while keeping out harmful ones. In contrast to the Solar form, the cell was active in keeping account of durations and allowed for a calculation on the external boundary.
We have seen thus far the process of grammatologies interacting, producing derivatives and leaving open a process which we shall now deem solarization. Solarization relates to the genetics of grammar and logics of the Sun, how a pre-genetic form literally informs the process of counting and acquiring new levels of Gestalts. If we were to now draw out a timeline of ones life, the solarization process is the dialectic advancement of the nothingness remembered at birth towards the thanatoid drive to complete the eternal circle. The Ouroboric completion of the Sun that results from the ensuing temporal accounting operation now crunches and compresses the mini-simulation of the process. The genetic solar inheritance optimizes the experience of re-creating the Sun from the Suns expulsions, resulting in a captured moment being built-upon as a program of recapturing and contracting yet another contraction, as the process grows to the point of the actual Sun being lost somewhere in translation; the void has been lost and we may only speak of the void as a negative within the grammar of nouns and verbs. We have now come literally come back full circle, as the modern pseudosolar order demands of the individual to speak in the already done, already simulated prescription of remaking the Sun. The late-stage solarization process is one of the procedural progression of the eternal return towards a reproductive process of further and further Gestaltisation, and if we were to take the account of Hinduism, the Kali Yuga now reigns as the rebirth of the real Sun and the reinstation of what it truly is; the Black Sun and the Void internal to everything. The modernity of Now faces a liminality of a grammatology produced by the reconstruction of the Sun.
Nevertheless, the basic operation of modern pseudosolar grammatology is of reproduction. A continuous solarized order is produced through reproducing procedurally counting levels. The reproductive schema works on the base N to the power n in the most basic iteration. Modern Abrahamic religion placed the psychic emphasis on the base 2, reproducing onward in the image of the One, which is the Gestalt of the multiple. We can immediately see that this is quite pseudo solar, as the sun (base 0, for circularity) breaks the entire function, immediately going back to 0, completing the circle too early, leaving room for no one (1). The series end with the zerowth instant base. This leaves implications for the psyche of grammatology. The future appears as the completion of the inevitable past, leaving the future the only continuation of the series. Reproduction orients itself towards the planning of contraction. Contractions which literally entail the connection of one sexual organ to another. The product is the continuous disenchantment of the previously solar grammatology. The modern human cannot fully realize the ethics of his own judgement, and it is role of the future Ubermensch to fully own up to their own void, and their own internal Black Sun. Whereas weakness is the blindness of what is externally imposed, it is strength that owns up to the entire process. Calculation of one’s position within crafting a reproductive system for himself is inclusive of taking a different base, arriving early and too soon. A hedonist may take the base of 3 instead of two, producing a series out of sync from the pseudodolar order. The overman in this case plays with the continuity of things, as a nomad of the old world lingering in creating a space, taking possession of it on order to service the genetic solar lineage that is immanent to him. Appearance here is beyond the Black Sun, as the most aggressive of men may force their will upon everything in the surroundings and the meekest may simply let things arrive. However, neither submit to the pseudosolar, and engage in grammatologies that propel them to the concentric and the circular.
This is precisely the application of a Concentric Grammatology, and in taking such a route, the true solar immanence found in the temporal past and future may finally break even into the present as a messy, indeterminate continuity of individualized temporality and dynamics, ushering in the creation of a new world of possibilities.
At the heart of Concentric Grammatology is of course, the circle. The circle is the information of the concentric system, as it in-forms, enclosing a void into a space. An accounting surface is then formed based on the crunching amplifier of resonance onto a the progression of the solar process. A constant repetition makes asunder any notion of a transcendental arising from a particular notion of a Thing, in service to a Universal in the linguistic web. Such is the act of simulating and crunching down, something that the Concentric System seeks to wholly avoid. Thus, if we were to draw a circle of circles, a solar repetition we would be left with something quite akin to what the Hermeticists and Alchemists had described as celestial sphere. Taking account of the principle of “as above, so below”, the Hermetic schema of recursively makes itself appear; the microcosms serves to reflect the macrocosmic wills. Such is thus an emanation from the Centre, the One and the Monad. Here we can recognise that the One (1) is a mere simulacra of the Zero. We seek to fall into the pseudo solar yet again; a reproduction of the multiple in reflection to the One. To avoid such endless regress, we must take the 0 as the centre at the internal immanent level. In our drawn Concentric Rings, mapping the centre means corresponding it to the void. By opening the mouth, allowing air to flow in the endless return of the 0 produces and “aaaa” sound. That is the primary vowel of the system.
The grammatology of English sounds can be mapped into a solar form according to the following: six concentric rings map out to six radii representing the classifications of sounds. R=0 maps to silence and empty opening (void), r=1 represents vowels, r=2 approximants, r=3 nasals, r=4 stops, r=5 affricates and r=6 fricatives. This represents the solarization of the mouth’s openings; a common base ground is repeated through the process of individuation as different gradients of closure are bifurcated. The second repetition is one of the angle of the circle radii, as the angle represents position of the tongue shifting into various forms. It completes the surface of accounting, as sounds are mapped from an angle of 0 degrees, representing the lips, all the way to 360, representing the throat. Each sound of the English language is thus mapped into these two factors of solarization, and writing thus proceeds in a bypass of the crunching optimization of the pseudo solar, leaving ambiguity as a part of experience. Linking the points reveals a sigil into a penetration of thought into the Thing, making grammatology a code of thought-linking rather than separating into the infinite. The Black Sun is precisely the operation of presence and synthesis. A black flame informs system into transformation, and dynamism, making language a web of corresponding synchronicities of reality.
An example of the word “aeon” becomes the following if the sounds are connected according to the chart:
Bibliography:
Cosmo-ontology, Hyperpsych: https://hyperpsych.org/brane-bulk-cosmo-ontology/
Parasitic Poetics: poetry as schizogonic semantics, Hyperpscyh: https://hyperpsych.org/parasitic-poetics-poetry-as-schizogonic-semantics/
A brief introduction to Anexelentic Systems, Hyperpsych: https://hyperpsych.org/a-brief-introduction-to-anexelentic-systems/
Yuk Hui, Resistivity and Contingency: http://marcell.memoryoftheworld.org/Yuk%20Hui/Recursivity%20and%20Contingency%20(3595)/Recursivity%20and%20Contingency%20-%20Yuk%20Hui.pdf
Jean-Luc Nancy, Hegel: the Restlessness of the Negative
Hyperpsych 