Liob, 2021
tags: DNA, lateral data, spatiality, projection, xenoDNA, post-cybernetics
The informatics of Being
Within the informatics of Being, that being the nature of information in the concave ontological realm of reality, we can assuredly say that we come with a problem, one which appears as a necessary “blending” or contradiction of previous orders given across time. The exact nature of informatics in concavity proves a paradox in itself for a few reasons: (1) The linguistic nature of information, that being symbolics of vocalization and expression, is given as a disordered, static-heavy map upon which we can trace a phenomenological genealogy of coming-into-existence and the disintegration that by itself is a linguistic reflection of that which is its topic or in other words, it is a reflection which in turn, acts as map which we can use for our phenomenological being. (2) Due to the previous reason, we cannot say that language is incorruptible in giving us ontology and this is proven to be the case with concavity, as the topological surface of our reality is neither flat nor an immanent static field. (3) We can infer therefore, that informatics instead of language can be used as ontological map. However, informatics itself can fall victim to concavity, it is never a stationary immanent source of information, rather it matches the topology of overall reality-being; it never escapes from the process and is merely riding along. For these reasons, we can therefore assume that the corruption of information, which later we will refer to this as “lateralization”, is in itself the product of Being-maneuver with processes matching ontological gaps and cliffs of our immanent, dynamic model of metaphysics. (See: Beyond Being: Being-in-the-World as an Object of Worldliness).
The main topic we reach from our earlier assertion is that of informational compression, or the process of information being compressed across space-time into closer and closer planes of space. We may infer first and foremost that compression is the natural result of Outside and Inside topology, appearing in the following informational coupling: the reaching collision of intentionality and the triplicity of Insideness reaches a breaking point, releasing information into the external Outside, thereby causing a simulated intrusion of said information into a new ordering of information in the temporal Future-a simulated viral infection, which acts as the corrupting of data. Put into simpler terms, the corrupted data is the invasion of mistaken, forgotten data. Compression can be taken as literal spatial, compression, data is simply too close together-spatial planes of data-ordering are literally colliding as they compress. Temporally, compression entails Lateralization or simply “reading the data side-to-side rather than top-to-bottom” We may use a preliminary example: a sequence of colors-red, green, blue, yellow is recorded as data and compressed into a small data-file. What is a satisfying payoff of our ontological mechanism is that we can maybe say, load it onto a computer and simply compress the file into smaller informational sizes or quite literally and physically, record the sequence on paper and then crumble the paper, the result is the same, that of a lateralization of data. The collision of the four plains in which the colors inhabit are colliding and actively expelling information, and we may see this as a reading of “nothing, green, nothing” or a completely new data-set of “blue, red, green, yellow”. The spatial plains have collided and the temporal shift is noticeable. Lateralization is the inherent ontological procedure that arises as a risk of compressing data too closely in space and time. Lateralization therefore produces corruption that by-itself is not an error.
XenoDNA and the post-human implication
Lateralization introduces a new interesting paradigm when considering biological informational systems. Specifically, the translation, copying and storing of Deoxyribonucleic acid or DNA. Briefly returning to lateralization itself, we designated it as the inherent risk arising from the compression of data, where the spatial-temporal plains of being expel information. To map lateralization onto DNA, we can immediately point to the wrapping of DNA strands onto histones. The process itself can be elegantly described as a spatiotemporal lateralization in itself, as the DNA strands, which would on one long spatial plain and temporal ordering are compressed across multiple different points in space and in time. The main problematic can arise when DNA is copied or translated, as the lateral nature of compressed DNA runs the risk of corrupted, divergent data. This process is not the same as a direct mutation, but rather a basic informatic-ontological process that is already pre-ensured across time to occur in a given biological system. The presence of safeguards, such as the direct copying of DNA into practically every cell does act as a counter to lateralization. However, DNA as a biological prior is very risky to handle and due to its potential to incite a rapid feedback loop; the lateralized reading of the safeguards themselves can induce a wide gap for more lateralization to occur, therefore leading to large accumulation of xenoDNA, or directly lateralized DNA acting as a contagion upon the biological system.

The biological system itself is therefore not dependent on simple evolutionary selection to evolve in the broader sense, but rather it relies on ontological processual change from the previous configuration of the system. Temporally and spatially, the biological system has the opportunity to evolve backwards and forwards through the spatial projection of Being. This therefore carries a new ethical dimension that fully detaches itself from the autonomous, human subject and deontological understanding and allows for a new post-human xenodynamics to take its place. To fully conclude, from the moment you are born, you are already post-human. Evolution therefore, is far more radical then we could imagine in a closed, humanist sense.
Bibliography:
Hyperpsych: Beyond Being: Being-in-the-World as an Object of Worldliness, https://hyperpsych.org/beyond-being-being-in-the-world-as-an-object-of-worldliness/
Hyperpsych: The Meat World: an intersection of Biosemiotics and Utility, https://hyperpsych.org/the-meat-world-an-intersection-of-biosemiotics-and-utility/
Delueze and Guattari: Anti-Oedipus
